Public Performance, Communication & Display: What Is “Public”?

Public Performance, Communication & Display  What Is Public By Joshua Graubart{3:06 minutes to read} As discussed in earlier posts, among the exclusive rights accorded to copyright holders is the right to perform or display their works publicly, or to authorize others to do so.  Consequently, copyright law generally limits the exclusive rights of the copyright holder, and thus permits certain private uses of a protected work without the rightsholder’s permission, whereas public exploitation requires permission and/or payment.  It follows that the definition of “public” is of great importance and varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. 

In most jurisdictions, the rightsholder’s monopoly on performance and/or display ends at the domestic threshold; a performance or display is not “public” where it is made to an audience consisting solely of family or close friends. The UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, for example, speaks of an audience “domestic or quasi-domestic in character.” The US Copyright Act describes “a normal circle of a family and its social acquaintances.”

Continental Approaches

The French Intellectual Property Code likewise speaks of the “the family circle,” but narrows the exception further by requiring that the performance be without charge. Thus, performances even for audiences who would qualify as within the “family circle” may require a license from the rightsholder if members of the audience are asked to contribute to the cost of performance.

German law, by contrast, broadens the exception. The German Copyright Law deems a performance not “public” regardless of “family” or “domestic” considerations so long as the audience members form “a clearly defined group and are connected by personal relationship with each other or with the organizer.”

The difference between the scope of the French and German exceptions can be seen when applied to specific cases.  Boarders in a children’s group home in France did not qualify as within the “family circle,” nor did amateur clubs or small groups of people who were not very well acquainted.  By contrast, in Germany, a performance to multiple unrelated patients in a hospital ward did not constitute a “public” performance.

The US and the UK

Generally, as the similarity of language implies, British and American law leans closer to the French interpretation.  Performances in “members-only” clubs, in factories and in prisons in the US and the UK have all been deemed “public” for the purposes of the rightsholder’s exclusive right to license such performances.

Questions about whether a proposed performance is “public” or not?  Please feel free to contact us.

Joshua GraubartJoshua Graubart
646-781-9321
jggraubart@graubartlaw.com
www.graubartlaw.com

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Foreign Copyright Analysis, International Copyright Practice, Joshua Graubart and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s